Results for Chemical Groups

You may use, distribute or copy the information in these data tables, with attribution to Biomonitoring California.
For more information, visit our researchers page or contact us.
Results on page last updated:

Chemical Group: Metals

  • Measured in: Urine

Project: Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) - 2.Expanded

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
Uranium Uranium NA µg/L 218 0.00709 0.00533 0.00944 0.00215 0.00752 0.0181 0.0635 82.0% 0.00134 µg/L
Uranium Uranium Creatinine µg/g creatinine 218 0.00775 0.00606 0.00990 0.00349 0.00664 0.0149 0.0645 82.0% 0.00134 µg/L
Footnotes
  • ●Expanded BEST data from 218 participants was weighted, a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented samples, so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Central Valley. Unweighted results are available to download on the Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) – 2. Expanded project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Los Angeles County (CARE-LA)

CARE LA Study logo, showing California in blue with Los Angeles County in orange

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
Uranium Uranium NA µg/L 428 * * * < LOD < LOD 0.0193 0.116 48.6% 0.0100 µg/L
Uranium Uranium Creatinine µg/g creatinine 426 * * * < LOD < LOD 0.0313 0.116 49.3% 0.0100 µg/L
Footnotes
  • *Geometric mean was not calculated because the chemical was found in less than 65% of the study group.
  • ▶CARE-LA data were weighted (a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented demographic characteristics in a study sample) so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Los Angeles County. Unweighted results are available to download on the California Regional Exposure Study, Los Angeles County (CARE-LA) project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Region 2 (CARE-2)

Logo for the CARE-2 study showing a blue map of California with the eastern part of California in orange

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
Uranium Uranium NA µg/L 357 * * * < LOD < LOD 0.0216 0.0805 49.6% 0.0100 µg/L
Uranium Uranium Creatinine µg/g creatinine 357 * * * < LOD < LOD 0.0316 0.112 49.6% 0.0100 µg/L
Footnotes
  • *Geometric mean was not calculated because the chemical was found in less than 65% of the study group.
  • ▽CARE-2 data from 357 participants were weighted, a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented samples, so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial, Mono, and Inyo counties. Unweighted results are available to download on the California Regional Exposure Study, Region 2 (CARE-2) project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Region 3 (CARE-3)

Logo for the CARE-3 study showing a blue map of California with Orange and San Diego counties in orange
  • Study Group Subset: Adults

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
Uranium Uranium NA µg/L 90 * * * <LOD <LOD 0.0164 0.0326 40.0% 0.0100 µg/L
Footnotes
  • *Geometric mean was not calculated because the chemical was found in less than 65% of the study group.
  • ⌂Due to the COVID-19 emergency, CARE-3 was stopped early and only 90 people completed all study steps. The results from this small non-representative sample cannot be generalized to the population of San Diego and Orange counties.