Results for Chemical Groups

You may use, distribute or copy the information in these data tables, with attribution to Biomonitoring California.
For more information, visit our researchers page or contact us.
Results on page last updated:

Chemical Group: Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)

  • Measured in: Serum

Project: Asian/Pacific Islander Community Exposures (ACE) Project - ACE 1

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/ml 96 0.477 0.406 0.559 0.281 0.453 0.739 1.49 80.2% 0.250

Project: Asian/Pacific Islander Community Exposures (ACE) Project - ACE 2

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/ml 99 0.559 0.490 0.636 0.393 0.541 0.823 1.28 87.9% 0.250

Project: Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) - 1.Pilot

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/mL 110 0.245 0.216 0.278 0.160 0.254 0.334 0.767 100% 0.0349 ng/mL

Project: Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) - 2.Expanded

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/mL 337 0.162 0.146 0.180 0.0901 0.161 0.262 0.522 79.1% 0.0877 ng/mL
Footnotes
  • ○Expanded BEST data from 337 participants was weighted, a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented samples, so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Central Valley. Unweighted results are available to download on the Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) – 2. Expanded project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Los Angeles County (CARE-LA)

CARE LA Study logo, showing California in blue with Los Angeles County in orange

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/mL 425 * * * <LOD 0.0795 0.164 0.321 62.3% 0.0560 ng/mL
Footnotes
  • *Geometric mean was not calculated because the chemical was found in less than 65% of the study group.
  • ▶CARE-LA data were weighted (a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented demographic characteristics in a study sample) so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Los Angeles County. Unweighted results are available to download on the California Regional Exposure Study, Los Angeles County (CARE-LA) project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Region 2 (CARE-2)

Logo for the CARE-2 study showing a blue map of California with the eastern part of California in orange

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/mL 358 * * * <LOD 0.0768 0.144 0.252 63.3% 0.0560 ng/mL
Footnotes
  • *Geometric mean was not calculated because the chemical was found in less than 65% of the study group.
  • ◀CARE-2 data from 358 participants were weighted, a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented samples, so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial, Mono, and Inyo counties. Unweighted results are available to download on the California Regional Exposure Study, Region 2 (CARE-2) project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Region 3 (CARE-3)

Logo for the CARE-3 study showing a blue map of California with Orange and San Diego counties in orange
  • Study Group Subset: Adults

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/mL 89 0.0942 0.0802 0.111 <LOD 0.0926 0.174 0.234 67.4% 0.0560 ng/mL
Footnotes
  • ⌂Due to the COVID-19 emergency, CARE-3 was stopped early and only 90 people completed all study steps. The results from this small non-representative sample cannot be generalized to the population of San Diego and Orange counties.

Project: California Teachers Study (CTS)

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/mL 1759 0.22 0.21 0.23 0.15 0.23 0.35 0.67 94.7% 0.032

Project: Firefighter Occupational Exposures (FOX) Project

  • Study Group Subset: Firefighters

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of detection (LOD)
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/mL 101 0.899 0.783 1.03 0.512 0.721 1.72 2.63 100% 0.032

Project: Maternal and Infant Environmental Exposure Project (MIEEP)

  • Study Group Subset: Pregnant women

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/mL 77 * * * <LOD <LOD 0.035 0.64 0.032
Footnotes
  • *Geometric mean was not calculated because the chemical was found in less than 65% of the study group

Project: Measuring Analytes in Maternal Archived Samples (MAMAS) – MAMAS 1

  • Study Group Subset: Subsample 2

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFDA PFDA NA ng/mL 200 0.198 0.174 0.226 0.0950 0.212 0.373 0.908 83.0% 0.0652 ng/mL

Project: Measuring Analytes in Maternal Archived Samples (MAMAS) – MAMAS 2

  • Study Group Subset: Subsample 2

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
PFDA PFDA ng/mL 292 0.213 0.196 0.231 0.135 0.189 0.320 0.752 99.0% 0.0542 ng/mL

Project: Measuring Analytes in Maternal Archived Samples (MAMAS) – MAMAS 3

  • Study Group Subset: Subsample 2

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
PFDA PFDA ng/mL 96 0.187 0.160 0.220 0.109 0.169 0.285 0.613 99.0% 0.0542 ng/mL