Results for Chemical Groups

You may use, distribute or copy the information in these data tables, with attribution to Biomonitoring California.
For more information, visit our researchers page or contact us.
Results on page last updated:

Chemical Group: Metals

  • Measured in: Urine

Project: Asian/Pacific Islander Community Exposures (ACE) Project - ACE 1

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
Arsenic Arsenic NA µg/L 100 22.2 18.2 27.0 12.6 22.1 44.0 131 100% 0.162

Project: Asian/Pacific Islander Community Exposures (ACE) Project - ACE 2

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
Arsenic Arsenic NA µg/L 100 33.6 27.4 41.1 18.0 35.4 70.5 121 100% 0.100

Project: Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) - 1.Pilot

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
Arsenic Arsenic NA µg/L 108 11.6 9.30 14.5 5.08 10.9 21.5 102 100% 0.0493 µg/L

Project: Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) - 2.Expanded

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
Arsenic Arsenic NA µg/L 218 8.60 7.05 10.5 5.08 10.3 14.0 41.6 100% 0.0493 µg/L
Arsenic Arsenic Creatinine µg/g creatinine 218 9.40 8.25 10.71 5.35 9.29 13.8 29 100% 0.0493 µg/L
Footnotes
  • ●Expanded BEST data from 218 participants was weighted, a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented samples, so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Central Valley. Unweighted results are available to download on the Biomonitoring Exposures Study (BEST) – 2. Expanded project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Los Angeles County (CARE-LA)

CARE LA Study logo, showing California in blue with Los Angeles County in orange

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
Arsenic Arsenic NA µg/L 428 8.06 6.69 9.71 3.63 7.91 16.7 67.2 100% 0.100 µg/L
Arsenic Arsenic Creatinine µg/g creatinine 426 10.6 9.06 12.3 5.16 9.14 18.8 59.7 100% 0.100 µg/L
Footnotes
  • ▶CARE-LA data were weighted (a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented demographic characteristics in a study sample) so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Los Angeles County. Unweighted results are available to download on the California Regional Exposure Study, Los Angeles County (CARE-LA) project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Region 2 (CARE-2)

Logo for the CARE-2 study showing a blue map of California with the eastern part of California in orange

Weighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 95th
Arsenic Arsenic NA µg/L 357 6.40 5.16 7.96 2.69 6.27 11.5 42.1 100% 0.100 µg/L
Arsenic Arsenic Creatinine µg/g creatinine 357 8.40 7.10 9.94 4.02 6.86 14.2 50.4 100% 0.100 µg/L
Footnotes
  • ▽CARE-2 data from 357 participants were weighted, a statistical method to adjust over-represented and under-represented samples, so that the summary results adequately reflect the population of California’s Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial, Mono, and Inyo counties. Unweighted results are available to download on the California Regional Exposure Study, Region 2 (CARE-2) project page.

Project: California Regional Exposure Study, Region 3 (CARE-3)

Logo for the CARE-3 study showing a blue map of California with Orange and San Diego counties in orange
  • Study Group Subset: Adults

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight Notes
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
Arsenic Arsenic NA µg/L 90 6.13 4.57 8.21 2.46 4.44 18.5 40.0 100% 0.100 µg/L
Footnotes
  • ⌂Due to the COVID-19 emergency, CARE-3 was stopped early and only 90 people completed all study steps. The results from this small non-representative sample cannot be generalized to the population of San Diego and Orange counties.

Project: Firefighter Occupational Exposures (FOX) Project

  • Study Group Subset: Firefighters

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Detection Frequency Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
Arsenic Arsenic NA μg/L 101 10.8 9.03 12.9 6.05 10.4 21.0 34.9 100% 0.158

Project: Maternal and Infant Environmental Exposure Project (MIEEP)

  • Study Group Subset: Pregnant women

Unweighted Results

Chemical measured Indicates Exposure to Adjusted for Units Number of people tested Geometric mean 95% Confidence Interval Selected Percentiles Limit of Detection (LOD), wet-weight
Lower Upper 25th 50th 75th 90th
Arsenic Arsenic NA µg/L 89 7.71 6.39 9.32 4.34 8.15 11.2 34.9 0.158